Skip to main content
Hero background

NATO Information Assurance

NATO information assurance refers to the frameworks, policies, and evaluation processes used to ensure that technologies deployed in NATO environments meet strict security requirements. These frameworks support the protection of classified and mission‑critical information across multinational defense operations. Because NATO operations involve multiple member nations, security evaluation processes help establish a consistent baseline of trust for communications systems, cryptographic technologies, and IT infrastructure.

Organizations that develop communications platforms, cybersecurity technologies, or digital infrastructure intended for government and defense use often seek evaluation under NATO-aligned security frameworks. These evaluations help demonstrate that systems can safely support coalition operations, command‑and‑control communications, and secure data exchange among allies.

Rather than operating a single universal certification program, NATO relies on a combination of security policies, evaluation schemes, and product listings. One of the most important mechanisms is the NATO Information Assurance Product Catalogue (NIAPC), which identifies products that have undergone security evaluation and may be considered for use within NATO networks or environments.

Why NATO Information Assurance Matters

NATO missions depend on secure communications and reliable digital infrastructure. Information assurance ensures that systems used in operational environments can protect sensitive information against cyber threats, espionage, and system compromise.

Modern defense operations increasingly rely on digital systems for logistics, intelligence sharing, and real‑time decision making. Information assurance frameworks help verify that these technologies maintain confidentiality, integrity, and availability under demanding operational conditions.

NATO security requirements also promote interoperability. Because allied nations operate different technologies and networks, standardized evaluation processes help ensure that approved solutions can securely communicate across national boundaries.

By adopting recognized security evaluation practices, NATO helps reduce operational risk while enabling trusted collaboration among governments, defense organizations, and mission partners.

Key Security Principles in NATO Information Assurance

Confidentiality: Sensitive information must be protected against unauthorized disclosure. Encryption and access controls help ensure that only authorized users can view classified or mission‑critical data.

Integrity: Systems must ensure that data cannot be altered without authorization. Integrity protections help prevent tampering, data corruption, and manipulation of operational information.

Availability: Critical communications and information systems must remain operational during missions. Resilient infrastructure and redundancy are essential for maintaining system availability.

Authenticity and accountability: Users and systems must be able to verify the identity of communication partners. Authentication mechanisms help ensure trusted communications across coalition networks.

NATO Information Assurance Product Catalogue (NIAPC)

The NATO Information Assurance Product Catalogue is an important resource used by NATO organizations and national defense agencies. The catalogue lists products that have undergone recognized security evaluation and are considered suitable for deployment in NATO environments under specific conditions.

Inclusion in the catalogue does not automatically mean universal deployment approval. Instead, it provides assurance that the technology has undergone security evaluation and may be considered during accreditation and procurement processes.

Products included in the catalogue typically fall into categories such as:

  • Secure communications systems 

  • Cryptographic devices and software 

  • Network security platforms

  • Endpoint protection solutions

  • Secure mobility technologies 

These technologies support a wide range of operational requirements, from tactical communications systems used in the field to enterprise‑grade cybersecurity platforms used within government networks.

Security Evaluation Approaches Used by NATO

Security evaluation supporting NATO deployments often relies on internationally recognized certification frameworks. One of the most widely used frameworks is the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation. Common Criteria provides a structured method for evaluating the security properties of IT products.

Under this framework, vendors define a Security Target that describes the security capabilities of the product and the threats it is designed to address. Independent evaluation laboratories then test the product against defined requirements. National certification bodies review the results and issue certification when requirements are met.

Evaluations performed under Common Criteria can support NATO security assurance because they provide independently verified evidence of product security capabilities. In many cases, national authorities or NATO organizations review these evaluation results when determining whether a product may be suitable for NATO environments.

Typical Steps Toward NATO Security Acceptance

  • Align product design with NATO security requirements and operational needs.

  • Conduct formal security evaluation using recognized frameworks such as Common Criteria.

  • Provide documentation demonstrating cryptographic protections, secure architecture, and operational resilience.

  • Undergo review by relevant security authorities or defense organizations.

  • Potentially obtain listing in the NATO Information Assurance Product Catalogue.

The Role of Information Assurance in Modern Defense

Cyber threats continue to evolve rapidly, targeting government institutions, military infrastructure, and supply chains. Defense organizations must ensure that technologies used in operational environments can withstand sophisticated attacks.

Information assurance frameworks help organizations address risks such as advanced persistent threats, supply chain compromises, and vulnerabilities in complex digital ecosystems. These frameworks encourage best practices including secure system architecture, strong cryptography, identity‑based access controls, and continuous monitoring.

As defense operations increasingly rely on digital systems and connected technologies, information assurance will remain a critical component of national and international security strategies.

BlackBerry for Secure Communications

For Environments Where Failure Isn’t an Option

BlackBerry Secure Communications is the leading solution that delivers unmatched expertise to protect the world’s most critical communications.

Explore BlackBerry Secure Communications solutions